size of the system with the control component and n users without symmetry reduction.
| n | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| size of the system with n users | 35 | 220 | 1 280 | 7 040 | 37 120 | 189 440 | 942 080 |
- information involving verification of the reachability properties on the model.
| l | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cutoff | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
- The following table describes all reachable states in the system with any number of clients. For example
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
(3, 3, 1) || * - * 1 * - * ((3,3,1),2), ((3,3,1),4,4), ((3,3,1),6)
describe that of the control component is in the state (3, 3, 1) then it is possible that arbitrary number of users are in the local states 1, 3, 5, 7 (symbol "*"), no user is in the states 2, 6 (symbol "-"), and exactly one user must be in the state 4 (symbol "1").
- The (l+1)-tuples after each line denotes all unreachable (l+1)-tuples which do not contain an unreachable i+1-tuple for some i < l. Interesting fact is that such tuples are only 1+1-tuples and 2+1-tuples
Reachable states Unreachable l+1-tuples
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
(1, 1, 1) || * - * - * - * ((1,1,1),2), ((1,1,1),4), ((1,1,1),6)
(1, 2, 1) || * 1 * - * - * ((1,2,1),2,2), ((1,2,1),4), ((1,2,1),6)
(1, 3, 1) || * - * 1 * - * ((1,3,1),2), ((1,3,1),4,4), ((1,3,1),6)
(1, 1, 2) || * - * - * 1 * ((1,1,2),2), ((1,1,2),4), ((1,1,2),6,6)
(1, 2, 2) || * 1 * - * 1 * ((1,2,2),2,2), ((1,2,2),4), ((1,2,2),6,6)
(1, 3, 2) || * - * 1 * 1 * ((1,3,2),2), ((1,3,2),4,4), ((1,3,2),6,6)
(2, 1, 1) || * - * - * - * ((2,1,1),2), ((2,1,1),4), ((2,1,1),6)
(2, 2, 1) || * 1 * - * - * ((2,2,1),2,2), ((2,2,1),4), ((2,2,1),6)
(2, 3, 1) || * - * 1 * - * ((2,3,1),2), ((2,3,1),4,4), ((2,3,1),6)
(2, 1, 2) || * - * - * 1 * ((2,1,2),2), ((2,1,2),4), ((2,1,2),6,6)
(2, 2, 2) || * 1 * - * 1 * ((2,2,2),2,2), ((2,2,2),4), ((2,2,2),6,6)
(2, 3, 2) || * - * 1 * 1 * ((2,3,2),2), ((2,3,2),4,4), ((2,3,2),6,6)
(3, 1, 1) || * - * - * - * ((3,1,1),2), ((3,1,1,1),4), ((3,1,1),6)
(3, 2, 1) || * 1 * - * - * ((3,2,1),2,2), ((3,2,1),4), ((3,2,1),6)
(3, 3, 1) || * - * 1 * - * ((3,3,1),2), ((3,3,1),4,4), ((3,3,1),6)
(3, 1, 2) || * - * - * 1 * ((3,1,2),2), ((3,1,2),4), ((3,1,2),6,6)
(3, 2, 2) || * 1 * - * 1 * ((3,2,2),2,2), ((3,2,2),4), ((3,2,2),6,6)
(3, 3, 2) || * - * 1 * 1 * ((3,3,2),2), ((3,2,3),4,4), ((3,2,3),6,6)
(4, 1, 1) || * - * - * - * ((4,1,1),2), ((4,1,1),4), ((4,1,1),6)
(4, 2, 1) || * 1 * - * - * ((4,2,1),2,2), ((4,2,1),4), ((4,2,1),6)
(4, 3, 1) || * - * 1 * - * ((4,3,1),2), ((4,3,2),4,4), ((4,3,1),6)
(4, 1, 2) || * - * - * 1 * ((4,1,2),2), ((4,1,2),4), ((4,1,2),6,6)
(4, 2, 2) || * 1 * - * 1 * ((4,2,2),2,2), ((4,2,2),4), ((4,2,2),6,6)
(4, 3, 2) || * - * 1 * 1 * ((4,3,2),2), ((4,3,2),4,4), ((4,3,2),6,6)
(5, 1, 1) || * - * - * - * ((5,1,1),2), ((5,1,1),4), ((5,1,1),6)
(5, 2, 1) || * 1 * - * - * ((5,2,1),2,2), ((5,2,1),4), ((5,2,1),6)
(5, 3, 1) || * - * 1 * - * ((5,3,1),2), ((5,3,1),4,4), ((5,3,1),6)
(5, 1, 2) || * - * - * 1 * ((5,1,2),2), ((5,1,2),4), ((5,1,2),6,6)
(5, 2, 2) || * 1 * - * 1 * ((5,2,2),2,2), ((5,2,2),4), ((5,2,2),6,6)
(5, 3, 2) || * - * 1 * 1 * ((5,3,2),2), ((5,3,2),4,4), ((5,3,2),6,6)
"*" - an arbitrary number of users, "-" - no user, "1" - exactly one user.
[1] A. Poetzsch-Heffter, J. Aldrich, M. Barnett, D. Giannakopoulou, G. T. Leavens, and N. Sharygina http://www.cs.ucf.edu/~leavens/SAVCBS/2007/challenge.shtml
[2] P. Varekova and B. Zimmerova. Challenge problem: Subject-observer specification with component-interaction automata. In Proceedings of the ESEC/FSE Workshop on Specification and Verification of Component-Based Systems (SAVCBS'07), pages 75-81, Dubrovnik, Croatia, September 2007.